Help
How can we reduce methane?
What way to link the hills?
How can we reduce methane?
Methane is the #1 greenhouse gas in terms of our short-term ability to limit climate change due to its faster decay in the atmosphere. For a global initiative to reduce methane emissions, we need to address a wide array of questions from scientific and technical issues to policy, enforcement, and equity considerations. The first step of the process will be to agree on a movement-wide first roadmap document. Below are, along with possible answers for ideation, some of these questions we will have to answer: 1. **Who are the major contributors to global methane emissions?** - Possible Answer: The major contributors include the agriculture industry (livestock and rice production), fossil fuels (coal mines, oil and gas industry), waste management (landfills, waste treatment), and wetlands. 2. **What are the most effective strategies to reduce methane emissions?** - Possible Answer: Strategies could include improving the efficiency of the fossil fuel sector, reducing methane emissions from livestock and rice production, increasing the recovery and recycling of methane from waste, and investing in research for more efficient ways to capture methane. 3. **How will reductions be measured and verified?** - Possible Answer: This might require the development of new, more precise measurement techniques, satellite monitoring, and a globally agreed-upon standard for reporting and verifying reductions. 4. **What policies need to be put in place to support methane reduction?** - Possible Answer: These could include stricter regulations on methane emissions, subsidies for methane capture and reduction technologies, carbon pricing or methane taxing mechanisms, and policies to promote sustainable agricultural practices. 5. **How will compliance be ensured?** - Possible Answer: Compliance could be ensured through a combination of domestic enforcement, international monitoring, sanctions for non-compliance, and incentives for surpassing targets. 6. **How will the agreement ensure fairness between developed and developing countries?** - Possible Answer: This could involve mechanisms like providing financial and technical support to developing countries to enable them to implement methane reduction strategies. It might also require considering differentiated responsibilities, taking into account the differing historical contributions to methane emissions. 7. **What are the potential social and economic impacts of reducing methane emissions, and how can these be managed?** - Possible Answer: While there may be job losses in certain sectors, new jobs might also be created in emerging industries. Measures could be put in place to retrain workers for new industries and to support communities that are negatively impacted. 8. **How will technological development and innovation be promoted and shared?** - Possible Answer: This might involve international collaboration on research and development, providing incentives for innovation, and mechanisms for sharing technologies across borders. 9. **What is the timeframe for achieving reductions, and what interim targets will be set?** - Possible Answer: The timeframe will need to balance the urgency of reducing emissions with the practicalities of implementing reductions. Interim targets could be set to keep countries on track and to allow for adjustments based on progress and new scientific findings. Starting from these first questions and ideas, we will have more detailed discussion and analysis to address the complexities of reducing global methane emissions, in order integrate all stakeholders as world citizens and open actors to ensure their commitment and collaboration to tackle the problem.
Thinking broadly about methane
1 Current Position
Thinking broadly about methane
To make progress towards reducing global methane emissions, we first need to make world citizens aware of overlooked, under-discussed, or insufficiently addressed aspects.
- In a world of eight billions and still growing, we need foremost to look onto the role of agriculture, particularly livestock and rice production. Methane produced both by ruminant animals and rice cultivation is a major contributor to global emissions. We need to discuss the impact of our food choices, sustainable farming practices, and potential for innovation in this area more broadly, with keeping equity considerations in mind.
- We need to find ways to prevent methane leakage during the extraction, storage, and transportation of fossil fuels.
- We need to find ways to cope with the decay of organic waste in landfills and waste treatment facilities that generates methane, through practices as better waste separation, composting and recycling, and methane capture from landfills.
- We need to bridge the gap between the orthodoxies for and against the use of pricing mechanisms, and seriously tackle subsidies that indirectly encourage methane emissions, such as those for certain types of agriculture and fossil fuel extraction.
- We need to see what role an international agreement can play in supporting innovation in the research on technological solutions to reduce methane emissions, without serving as sedative.
- We need to understand how the crucial role of natural wetlands in biodiversity and carbon sequestration can be balanced with ways to decrease their current significant methane emittions.
but not yet adequately implemented, as methane capture in the fossil fuel industry and from landfills and waste treatment, sustainable agricultural practices, regulatory measures, introducing pricing, and reducing inadequate subsidies, we can build a plan that will make a significant impact to be a first step towards bringing the global temperature rise to an end!
Your trusted OA’s preferring Thinking broadly about methane
Other OA’s preferring Thinking broadly about methane
Arguments for Thinking broadly about methane over We need to act now!
“'Act now' is too shortsighted”
"Act now" overlook long-term sustainability in favor of quick fixes. It neglects broader structural changes needed for lasting impact, and does not adequately address systemic shifts like transitioning to sustainable agriculture and reducing dependence on fossil fuels, crucial for long-term methane reduction.
“Rae Edwards”
Nihil sint itaque es
“Too shortsighted”
The proposal titled 'We need to act now" is too shortsighted. Its ambition is praiseworthy, but there are numerous issues which partly make it even counterproductive.
We need to act now!
1 Current Position
We need to act now!
Methane is the one greenhouse gas that allows for the quickest successes in decreasing global temperature rise, but only if ACT NOW and apply a pragmatic, fast-acting strategy focusing on low-hanging fruits, actions that are technologically feasible, cost-effective, and have the greatest potential for near-term impact. We hence prioritize to:
- Plug Methane Leaks in the Fossil Fuel Sector: Methane emissions from the oil and gas sector are one of the largest and most immediately addressable sources. Technologies already exist to capture or prevent these leaks. Implementing stricter regulations and providing incentives for methane capture can quickly reduce emissions.
- Reduce Methane Emissions from Landfills: Landfills are another major source of methane. Implementing methane capture technologies at existing landfills, and promoting waste reduction, recycling, and composting can help reduce these emissions.
- Promote Efficient Agriculture Practices: Changing farming practices, such as promoting alternative diets for ruminants to reduce enteric fermentation, implementing better manure management techniques, and improving rice paddy management can reduce agricultural methane emissions.
- Regulate Methane Emissions: Governments can set and enforce regulations to limit methane emissions from key sectors. This includes setting standards for methane capture and reduction, and imposing penalties for excessive emissions.
- Remove Fossil Fuel Subsidies: Subsidies that encourage fossil fuel production and consumption indirectly encourage methane emissions. Phasing out these subsidies can have a significant impact on methane emissions.
Your trusted OA’s preferring We need to act now!
Other OA’s preferring We need to act now!
Arguments for We need to act now! over Thinking broadly about methane
“Immediate and pragmatic”
"Act now" focuses on swift implementation of proven technologies, ensuring rapid reduction in methane emissions and prioritizing low-hanging fruits which maximizes short-term mitigation efforts.
“Fletcher Clements”
Natus est et ex mole